Americans have become overly reliant on others doing our work for us. In our domestic duties we have Rumbas so we don’t have to sweep and dishwashers so we don't have to wash a dish. Then we have people that prepare our food for us and have Doordash deliver it to our doorstep. We have innovated and innovated until we barely have to do anything for ourselves anymore — and this includes forming opinions. We don't need to do research and read to form an opinion because the media will do it for us. STRENGTHEN YOUR POSITION IN THE INFORMATION CHAIN Back in the 80's, we'd have slumber parties and play slumber party games. One of these games was called "Telephone." It's often used as an icebreaker and for object lessons. If you're not familiar with it, it goes something like this — everyone gets in a line and one person begins by whispering a phrase into the ear of

the person next to them. As people turn and pass the information down the line, problems in communication inevitably arise. People would whisper too quietly. Or people would laugh and forget parts of the phrase. And if forgotten they'd fill in the blanks with their best guess. Occasionally, you'd get a guy who purposely tried to mess it up. By the time the last person received the message they had to say it out loud for everyone to hear. The phrase “Jenny went to the store last night and bought a little stuffed weasel that she used to decorate her chicken coop so her chickens wouldn't poop" would turn into something like "Jimmy went to the store and bought stuff so that her chickens could make decorations from poop." ROLES IN THE INFORMATION CHAIN Even small misconceptions or misinterpretations that occur when the message is transmitted can end up making a huge difference in terms of the accuracy of the…

Americans are considered the product of a "melting pot" because their backgrounds, ethnicities and habits are so diverse. If they can't even agree on something as simple as a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, how can they agree on social policy? Yesterday I did the unthinkable and posted a truly controversial post on my Facebook feed. I described in specific detail how I construct a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. I felt compelled to discuss this because I consider myself somewhat of an expert. I've probably eaten close to 100,000 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. And once I refined my recipe I've never felt any reason to vary from my process or PB&J ideology — until today. My recipe was simple: Crunchy peanut butter and fruit jam/jelly and fresh bread. Peanut butter should go on one side of the bread and jelly on the other. And when finished, the two pieces should go right back together matching their original alignment

from inside the bag. The bread has lines on the top of the crust and a distinct shape. This should not be bastardized when assembling the sandwich. I thought my idea was pretty straightforward. Apparently, even discussing the creation of a proper Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwich in America is not that simple. The first person who chimed in was Austin Stevenot. I thought my post was really going somewhere when he literally liked my post and commented that he agreed 100%. Although he brought up something that made me think. Having always made my sandwich ONE WAY, I had never considered that someone would want anything other than chunky peanut butter. It seemed Austin was challenging me to see if we shared the same beliefs. Austin Stevenot: Would that be crunchy or smooth peanut butter? From his question, I knew that there would be challengers to my idea of a peanut butter sandwich. My answer was simple. Me: I…

And the Lord said to Cain, "Where is Abel your brother? And he said, "I do not know: am I my brother's keeper?" Someone on Facebook posted something I disagreed with the other day. I know what you're saying, "That happens to me all...the...time!" And I'm sort of glad it does! Posts I disagree with give my brain more exercise than posts I agree with. Sometimes I lie awake at night going over aspects of my argument in my head. For the most part, these resemble conversations with myself. Me: "There is no way that you have to be either a dog person OR a cat person. What if you just love all animals? Other Me: "That's just a false dilemma!" (A false dilemma is usually characterized by "either this or that" language but can also be recognized by an omission of choices.) The post that got me thinking the other day went something like this: "I can't believe that

people think we should be responsible for the health of others!"Poster on Facebook who lives in a vacuum. (Note: not the cleaning kind) The rant continued longer than this and there was of course the necessary pre-rant warning. But what the poster eventually expressed was that she didn't think she should have to wear a mask. If she transmitted Covid19 to someone else it wasn't her fault they got sick. The government was making her wear a mask in order to protect OTHERS from getting a virus. And the poster acted like this was the first time in her life (she's in her 40's) that she had ever encountered such a concept in America. It made me wonder if the poster had ever heard of laws against driving under the influence. Sure, that law is to protect the drunken fool from smashing up their car and themselves. But it is mostly meant to protect the family of four with the…